Close Menu
timesmoguls.com
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Science
  • Sports
Featured

“ The old man has just jumped on him ”: a video of crash in British Columbia becomes viral – BC

The best hopes of the NHL draft meet McDavid and merchant at the Stanley – Edmonton Cup final

Germany Merz says he is convinced that Trump is attached to NATO – National

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news from timesmoguls.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and services
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
timesmoguls.com
Contact us
HOT TOPICS
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Science
  • Sports
timesmoguls.com
You are at:Home»Science»Why is the nucleus of an atom not?
Science

Why is the nucleus of an atom not?

June 1, 2025004 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Dbt6djvflraa7tkfwqzyic.jpg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Since the atomic nucleus was the first proposed in 1911Physicists simply supposed that it was round. ​

But are the nuclei of atoms really round? Intuitively, this form is logical and the physicists believed that it explained the early measures of nuclear properties. It was not until years later that the first proof of a more complex image began to emerge.

First of all, let’s explore the architecture of the atom. Formed from a group of protons and neutrons in the center of an atom, a nucleus is 10,000 times smaller than the atom as a whole, “like a fly in a cathedral,” said David JenkinsA nuclear physicist at the University of York in the United Kingdom Despite most of the mass of an atom, the nucleus itself has very little impact on the properties of the atom at first glance. The chemistry of an atom is determined by the configuration of electrons, while all the physical characteristics arise from the way in which it interacts with other atoms.

You may love

In addition to the idea of ​​electron shells in atomic physics, in 1949, scientists proposed the Nuclear shell model: Protons and neutrons are seated in distinct nuclear shells, and an additional energy input can excite these particles to jump from top to bottom between fixed energy levels.

“But later, it has become obvious that most behaviors in the nuclei have been described by what you call collective behavior – it acts as a coherent object,” Jenkins told Live Science. The result is that the nucleus as a whole can then demonstrate two types of properties: it can turn or it can vibrate.

In relation: Where do the electrons get energy to turn around the nucleus of an atom?

Spectroscopic methods can detect this rotation in most molecules, measuring a fingerprint of different levels of rotation energy. But spherical objects seem from the same direction to management, therefore symmetrical systems – as atoms – Do not generate a spectrum.

Get the most fascinating discoveries in the world delivered directly to your reception box.

“The only way you can see proof of rotation in the nuclei is if the nucleus is distorted,” said Jenkins. “And people have seen that the nucleus has excitement models called rotation strips, so that the nucleus is distorted.”

Since this astonishing discovery in the 1950s, targeted experiences have revealed a raft of nuclear forms, from pears For M&M – and Round is an exception and not the rule. About 90% of nuclei have the form of American football – technically called “distorted prolate” – in their lowest energy state, with surprisingly few people who take the shape of a crushed sphere, of type M&M, called a distorted Oblate.

“We do not know why this prolate form seems more favorable than the Oblate form,” said Jenkins. “Some nuclei also have several forms so that they can present one in the fundamental state, then you put energy there and they deform in another form.”

The more exotic pear -shaped nucleus is limited to certain areas of the nuclear graphic, in particular around radium, while spherical nuclei are generally confined to atoms with “magic” (or full shells) of nuclear particles. But what causes distortion?

“It is intuitive that the basic form of an object is not excited or flickering or stretched must be spherical,” said Paul StevensonA nuclear physicist at the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom “but in fact, in the case of nuclei, it is surprising that one of them is spherical because they obey the laws of quantum mechanics.”

THE Schrödinger equation – one of the most fundamental principles of quantum mechanics – Mathematically predicts how the wave function of an object will change over time, essentially providing a means of estimating the possible movement and position of this object. The resolution of this for an atomic nucleus therefore provides a probability cloud for all the possible places it could be, which, taken together, give the nuclear form.

“The basic solutions of the Schrödinger equation do not seem spherical – you get these forms that go in a circle, but then they start to agitate,” said Stevenson. “So, because these quantum wave-wave solutions themselves have asymmetry, this makes particles in the nucleus more likely to point in a direction.”

For rare spherical nuclei, this ripples cancels. But scientists do not yet understand the reason – or if there is even one – why some of these distorted forms are much more common than others.

“It reverses an inheritance,” said Jenkins. “It is a complete reversal of how people originally perceived the nuclei, and there are still a lot of open questions.”

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous Article“We will be ready for you”: Letter of Pens from Bellingham Council to residents of British Columbia-British Columbia
Next Article The best 10 happiest states for the elderly, said the study

Related Posts

Mount of Sales Dominican Sister shares the journey after the pursuit of science, finding the faith

June 10, 2025

The Committee explores nuclear solutions at the request of AI

June 10, 2025

Science taken in a tear tide: how authoritarianism sweeps away policy based on evidence

June 9, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

We Are Social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
News
  • Business (1,793)
  • Entertainment (1,816)
  • Global News (1,945)
  • Health (1,738)
  • Lifestyle (1,718)
  • Politics (1,604)
  • Science (1,716)
  • Sports (1,762)
  • Technology (1,739)
Latest

The week of Ellsworth Americanlooking Back in June 122015: 10 years ago. Lamoine – “Each harvest has its enemy,” said Chuck Weber, lunching on strawberry runners from his farm in 4 hours 5 hours ago

“ The old man has just jumped on him ”: a video of crash in British Columbia becomes viral – BC

‘The technology is there to stay’ – an interview with Mikolaj Slawkowski Rode

Featured

The week of Ellsworth Americanlooking Back in June 122015: 10 years ago. Lamoine – “Each harvest has its enemy,” said Chuck Weber, lunching on strawberry runners from his farm in 4 hours 5 hours ago

“ The old man has just jumped on him ”: a video of crash in British Columbia becomes viral – BC

‘The technology is there to stay’ – an interview with Mikolaj Slawkowski Rode

We Are Social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
News
  • Business (1,793)
  • Entertainment (1,816)
  • Global News (1,945)
  • Health (1,738)
  • Lifestyle (1,718)
  • Politics (1,604)
  • Science (1,716)
  • Sports (1,762)
  • Technology (1,739)
© 2025 Designed by timesmoguls
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and services

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.