One day after a blocked court The prices of American president Donald Trump On the country’s business partners, the American Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit suspended the court order.
In what is a stay for the Trump administration, the court granted suspension on the orders of the previous courts which had blocked Trump’s prices.
“The request for immediate administrative suspension is granted to the extent that the judgments and the permanent injunctions rendered by the International Trade Court in these cases are temporarily suspended until further notice while this Court examines the requests of requests,” said the court order on Thursday.
This occurs just a few hours after Prime Minister Mark Carney addressed the House of Commons and said Canada had greeted the court’s order against Trump’s policy.
“The government welcomed yesterday’s decision by the American international trade court, which is in accordance with the long -standing position of Canada that the USAPA US prices were illegal and unjustified,” Carney said in the House of Commons.
Carney’s comments came after a panel of three judges blocked some of Trump’s signature policies on Wednesday evening, including prices related to fentanyl and borders in Canada and Mexico. The court also blocked its global “reciprocal prices”, which Trump imposed in April, the appellant “Liberation Day”.
“The disputed tariff orders will be canceled and their operation permanently enjoined,” said the decision.
Carney had declared earlier Thursday than a number of prices in Canada remained, that the government will continue to fight.
“That said, we recognize that our commercial relationship with the United States is still deeply and negatively threatened and affected by equally unjustified prices (section) 232 against steel, aluminum and the automotive sector, as well as continuous threats of prices against other strategic sectors, including wood, semi-consumers and pharmaceutical products,” he said.
He said Canada will continue to establish a new relationship with the United States
“There is therefore the absolute priority of the new government of Canada to establish a new economic and security relationship with the United States and to strengthen our collaboration with trade partners and reliable allies around the world.”
After the first ordinance of the court, the chief of the Quebec Bloc, Yves-François Blanchet, said: “This gives future Canadian negotiators a better position. This reminds us that when you have to negotiate something with a friend, with your nearest friend and ally, you should not start by creating false reasons to impose prices. “

Trump has declared a national emergency on fentanyl earlier this year to justify the prices on Canada and Mexico, saying that they were necessary to arouse measures of these countries to slow down the deadly opioid flow.

Get daily national news
Get the best news of the day, the titles of political, economic and current affairs, delivered in your reception box once a day.
He then ordered that the United States’s trade deficits with several countries are also a national emergency.
But the court has stored on the side of several states and companies that challenged the prices on the economic damage that the applicants have been caused, and that only the Congress has the authority under the American Constitution to approve the prices.
On Thursday, the White House called a commercial court in court against Trump’s pricing policy, an example of an exceeding and declared that the Supreme Court was to rule in favor of Trump when the case arrives at the High Court.
Trump used powers under the International Emergency Economic Power Act (IEEPA) to impose several sets of prices in the countries of the world.
“What this ordinance of the court is doing is that he leaves all the prices that the Trump administration has imposed using authority under what is called IEEPA,” said Joseph Steinberg, economist at the University of Toronto, earlier before the news of reinstatement.
“All prices imposed following the urgency of fentanyl have disappeared,” said Steinberg, adding, however, that American prices on Canadian steel, aluminum and cars will remain.
Indeed, these prices were imposed not under the ieepa, but under article 232 of the 1974 trade law, which gives Trump the power to impose prices on the countries with which the United States has commercial imbalances, said Steinberg.
John Boscariol, an international international business lawyer based in Toronto, said on Thursday that Wednesday’s decision had not eliminated the threat of all prices, she confirmed Canada’s position.
“Canada was not disputed in court, but he confirmed Canada’s general position that there is no fentanyl emergency or emergency in the United States in terms of fentanyl imports or other Canada drugs in the United States,” he said.
However, they warned that this did not mean that Canada was out of the trade war.
“It could go to the Supreme Court of the United States. It is a process that could take a year, as long as an approximately year, and therefore it will not solve the problem right away, unfortunately,” said Boscariol.
Canadian industry looks closely.
The Canadian Chamber of Commerce said the only way out is a new trade agreement.
“We will leave this decision to progress in the American court system.
Canada’s automotive industry is also looking carefully at the court’s decision.
“The prices are still in place on the automobile and steel (under the powers of article 232), there is therefore (there is no impact on Canadian industry unfortunately,” said Brian Kingston, president of the Canadian Vehina Manufacturers Association.
David Adams, president and chief executive officer of Global Automakers of Canada, said that Wednesday’s decision had given them a little hope.
“It is rewarding that the American courts have validated what Canadians have known from the start, that the reasons for the prices were specious-at best,” he said.
“The decision gives hope that the other illegal tariffs of 232, like those of the Canadians cars, would also be the subject of a more in -depth investigation and also canceled on the basis of the letter side existing under the CUSMA.”
– with Sean Boynton Files of Global