In British Columbia Interior health The authority was struck by a collective appeal on a data violation In 2009, this would have compromised thousands of personal information from employees who ended up being sold on the Dark Web.
The trial brought by the Supreme Court of British Columbia said Thursday that data violation occurred in December 2009, exhibiting “very sensitive” personal information belonging to people who worked for the health authority between 2003 and 2009.
The court documents indicate that the information has been accessible by “cybercriminals and other malicious actors”, and “the complete extent” of hacking has still not been disclosed by domestic health during the 16 years since.
The former employee Rae Fergus, one of the main complainants, said that her personal information has been used since 2022 to fraudulently obtain a car loan and a credit card, and to open a bank account without “knowledge or consent”.
Susan Shaw, another proposed representative plaintiff who worked for the health authority, said in the proceedings that she only discovered data violation last month by reading a press article, and that it would have been offered two years of free credit follow -up after contacting domestic health on this subject.
Get health news on health
Receive the latest medical information and health information provided to you every Sunday.
The trial indicates that the Port Port Coquitlam, Surrey and Vernon since 2017 has discovered documents containing personal information for interior health workers, leading to the health authority publishing an online notice on hacking in March 2024, the “first public recognition” of the violation.
This Canadian press report was published for the first time on May 23, 2025.
& Copy 2025 the Canadian press