Martha Stewart Once shared very strong opinions on Blake Lively And her now disappeared blog – entitled Presert – and she did not hold back.
The actress, now 37, launched the Lifestyle blog in the summer of 2014, but unfortunately closed its doors a year later in 2015.
Now, with an animated entangled in a controversial legal battle With that ends with us Costar Justin Baldoni,, Users on Tiktok Take a look at some of his old messages on the site.
The website was not only a place where readers could read on style, food and art, but they could also buy various products.
Actually, Vanity Once, wrote that the items for sale were “all apparently designed for a bridal shower on the theme of the South”.
The blog also gained warmth in October 2014, after an editorial was published on “L’Astradication” of the Antebellum South.
When Lively decided to close the blog, she gave a long interview on this subject Vogueexplaining that “he never caught his original mission”.
“This does not make a difference in people’s lives, whether superficially or significantly,” said Gossip Girl at the time.
Martha Stewart shared strong opinions once on Blake Lively and her blog now disappeared, Presert – and she did not remember
The actress, 37
And, it looked like the queen of the house, Martha Stewart, agreed with the feelings of Lively, as she said US Weekly That sometimes it is simply better to let a project go.
Of course, the Lively reserve had been compared to tastes Stewart and Gwyneth Paltrow.
And, in the end, the two were actually friends due to neighbors.
‘I’m sorry! I’m sorry! I know she made a big effort, ” said Stewart at the exit at the time.
“Sometimes the closing is good. Listen, she is a movie actress. Why bother with trade at the moment? She continued.
“She is at the top of her career … I am totally favorable, but what do you know?” Maybe you can’t do everything at the same time.
About a year earlier, when Lively decided to start the website, Stewart urged people to give him a chance and the lifestyle blog.
“ Let it try ” said the founder of Martha Stewart’s CBD Huffpost in 2014.
“Sometimes the closing is good. Listen, she is a movie actress. Why bother with trade at the moment? She continued
During the interview, Stewart also said that the couple was “very friendly” and “very nice”
“I don’t want to say that facetiously!” She added laughing.
“I mean, it’s stupid, she could be an actress!” Why would you like to be me if you could be an actress? I just made a film yesterday, however – I can’t even tell you about it – but I want to be Blake Lively.
During the interview, Stewart also said that the couple was “very friendly” and “very nice”.
However, in November, the founder of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia launched a little shadow to the actor of Deadpool because she said he was not “so funny in real life”.
“No, it’s not that funny. It is very serious ”, shared Stewart during an appearance in the Bilt Rewards Bent Revee Game Show.
His comment came A few months before living filed a complaint against Baldoni to the California civil rights department on December 20.
She allegedly alleged that Baldoni entered her trailer while she was bare breasts, showed her graphic video of her wife, giving birth and bitten and sucked her lips during an improvised kisses scene.
She also accused him of plotting her reputation to dirty, citing an SMS from Baldoni advertising, Melissa Nathan, who said: “We can bury anyone”.
His comment came a few months before Lively filed a complaint against Baldoni with California Civil Rights Department on December 20
Baldoni Then continued the timeAffirming that he did not check the allegations of sexual harassment and reprisals of Lively and “ was almost entirely based on the unconcetic and selfish narrative of Lively, lifting it almost textually while ignoring an abundance of evidence that contradicts his claims ”.
The newspaper plans to “defend itself vigorously against the trial”, according to its spokesperson.
Then, Baldoni against Lively and Reynolds, turning the story on his head by claiming that it was their team making the mastor and asking for $ 400 million in damages.
He accused him of twisting the meaning of his texts and emails and tandem work with Leslie Sloane, a powerful Hollywood publicist, to plant damaged stories about her in the media.