It only takes six days to restrict the land from 68 to 16 teams, and after this whirlwind of basketball wall on wall, we can spend time hitting the reset on the photo of the NCAA tournament. When the Sweet 16 presents itself Thursday and Friday with eight regional clashes in the semi-finals through the two nights, it is really the start of a tournament in chaos that Mars madness.
An exercise that we appreciate this period of the year is to take stock of the remaining teams with a re-evaluation of the Sweet 16. This is not a real rethink exercise by emphasizing quadrum victories or the references in the net ranking or the winners above the bubble, but we noted the initial classification of the NCAA tournament selection committee of each team. Our re-embellishment is much more in the variety of energy classification, reacting to what we have seen in the first laps as a means of challenging the notes and the expectations of the avail.
Do not believe the necrologies: the first weekend of this year has not killed the madness of March ‘beloved Cinderella
David COBB
It should therefore not be a huge surprise that after an opening weekend where one of the greatest scenarios was the domination of the best teams that we see a fairly criminal reassessment of the remaining teams. Our seven best teams are the same seven best teams of the selection committee in their ranking for the initial medium, although we have notable changes among the heads n ° 1 in the first four. After that, we have changes in hierarchical order, reacting to notable results and readjust the hierarchical order for the teams which are mainly between seed n ° 3 and n ° 6 in the support.
Let’s dive, starting with a new n ° 1 team in the field.