Lifestyle care improves low back pain, the results “speak of themselves”

The main dishes to remember:

• The differences in low back disability at 26 weeks have favored the integrated life -style care intervention.
• This processing approach could also be beneficial for several other chronic diseases.

The integration of lifestyle care into low backgrounds has led to a greater improvement in disability, weight loss and quality of physical life in relation to the care recommended by guidelines, has shown a randomized study.

The results, published in Jama Network Open“Could influence future updates of back pain directives”, ” Emma Mudd, PhdResponsible for the main research at the University of Sydney in Australia and the main author of the analysis, in a press release. “Patients have evaluated holistic support and results speak for themselves.”

Current clinical lines for low back pain Organizations such as “does not recommend processing approaches focused on lifestyle due to very low confidence evidence”, according to Mudd and his colleagues.

However, they added that integrated care is approved by health policy and governments for people with several health challenges, “recognizing associations between chronic diseases and their determinants”.

To provide greater evidence on the effects of lifestyle medicine for researchers in low back pain, has randomly attributed 346 Australian participants suffering from such pain and at least a risk of lifestyle – like overweight, smoking , poor diet or physical inactivity – to either::

• the healthy lifestyle program, or help, intervention; Or
• Physiotherapy care based on guidelines.

Help intervention included care based on guidelines while integrating education and support for a healthy lifestyle of pain through educational resources, clinical consultations and health coaching based on The phone.

People assigned to the other study group only received guidelines care, which included pain education, advice and exercise.

The difference in handicap in the lower back, evaluated with the questionnaire of Roland Morris Hinability (RMDQ), between the 26 -week groups served as the main result of the study. The questionnaire classified disability on a scale from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater handicap.

The researchers also examined several secondary results, such as weight changes, smoking, the intensity of pain and the quality of physical and mental life.

The RMDQ average scores at the start were 14.7 in the aid group and 14 in the group only care.

The researchers reported an average difference of 1.3 points (95%CI, 2.5 to 0.2) in disability promoting aid at 26 weeks.

The sensitivity analysis of the primary result has revealed a significantly more important difference in favor of the invalidity of help companions compared to the Care Companions of the Directives (average difference = 5.4 points; 95%CI, 9 , 7 to 1.2).

Help participants also lost more weight (1.6 kg; 95%CI, 3.2 to 0) and had a greater improvement in the physical quality of life (physical operating score = 1.8; CI 95%, 0.1-3.4) compared to participants who are not guideline care.

There was no significant difference between the treatment group in the remaining secondary results or for serious adverse events.

MUDD and his colleagues noted that more research is necessary to clarify certain remaining questions on integrated life care – such as the resources necessary to implement this care in a routine practice – while engaging patients in this treatment ” There remains a challenge that can undermine an in -depth implementation ”.

They also wrote that data show how Integrate lifestyle care Back pain management can have broader health implications, treatment that does not only respond to pain, but also “(offering) an opportunity for preventive care of other heavy chronic diseases in a group of population population at risk ”.

“Clinicians dealing with back pain should consider how they Integrate the lifestyle support in their daily care, ” Christopher M. Williams, PhDAn associate professor at the University of Sydney and co-author of the study, said in the press release. “There does not seem to be good or bad way to do it, as long as the patient feels on hearing, and they are part of decision -making.”

References: