A Renowned professor at Harvard University was stripped of her mandate and dismissed after an investigation revealed that she has manufactured data on several studies focused on dishonesty.
Francesca Gino, a famous behavior scientist at the Harvard Business School, was released after the best board of directors of the school determined that she had modified the observations in four studies so that their results have strengthened her hypotheses, GBH News reported.
The Harvard administrators informed the faculty faculty that Gino was unemployed at a closed -door meeting last week, the point of sale reported.
Harvard has not detailed the dismissal or mandate of the professor under screening – citing it as a personnel question – but told GBH News that the school had not revoked the mandate of a teacher for decades.
No teacher has revoked their mandate to Harvard since the 1940s, when the American Association of University Professors have formalized dismissal rules, according to The Harvard Crimson.
The position contacted Harvard to comment.
Professor Star Ivy League – who had written more than 140 learned articles and won numerous prizes – had been examined pending in 2023 when a trio of behavior scientists published a series of blog articles on Data Colada With evidence accusing four of her articles published between 2012 and 2020, she had co-written contained “fraudulent data”.
A preliminary investigation into Gino’s work by Harvard was launched in October 2021, following concerns about a study that she co-authors who affirmed that individuals signed a commitment of honesty at the start of a form, rather than at the end, considerably strengthen the honest responses.
This study was definitely retracted in 2021 Due to the “evidence” of data manufacturing, which was based on three distinct laboratory experiences to support its results.
The same three behavioral scientists identified evidence that three other studies in the same article seemed to rely on manipulated data.
A complete investigation into allegations was carried out in 2022 and 2023Where Gino and the people who worked with her on the articles were questioned, with a faculty of the Harvard Business School by examining and analyzing her data, his emails and the manuscripts of the articles.
A company of external legal medicine has also been hired to analyze data from its studies.
Asked about problems with his work, Gino said that problems with his work can result from his research assistants or potential alteration by a person with “malicious intentions”, according to the University report.
However, the investigators rejected the two theories and provided results at HBS Dean Datar in March 2023.
The Ivy League school placed Gino on unpaid leave and started the termination procedures.
Investigators also suggested that Audit University The work of Gino and requests withdrawal for three of the articles; A fourth article had already been retracted at the time of their investigation.
As the investigation was underway in 2023, Gino denied allegations against her on her website.
“There is one thing that I know with certainty: I have not committed school fraud. I have not manipulated data to produce a particular result, ”she wrote.
“I did not falsify the data to strengthen any results. I did not commit the offense which I am accused of. Period.”
Gino – whose behavioral research studies relating to cheating, lies and dishonesty have received general media coverage in the last decade.
In legal files, Gino has called for reputation damage as well as loss of income and career opportunities due to the school’s investigation and decision to place it on administrative leave from June 2023, in addition to the Data Colada Blogs.
“Harvard shared their case. And although my lawyers discouraged me to express themselves, I just need to say that I have not – engaged in a school fraud,” Gino published on his website in March 2024.
“Once I had the opportunity to prove it before the Court of the Court of Law, with the support of the experts who have been refused to me by the Harvard investigation process, you will see why their case is so weak and that these are false allegations.”
However, a Federal Judge of Boston rejected Gino defamation complaints against Harvard and Data Colada bloggers last September, Harvard Crimson reported.
The judge ruled that the professor was a public figure, which would allow him to continue the work under the first amendment.