Some owners of Edmonton are trying to take the development of the city in hand by limiting where multi-united houses can be built.
They explore a legally binding agreement called a Restrictive alliance, This goes on a title deed and limits the way in which a property is used or developed, even after its sale to a new owner.
The residents of Crestwood Jasmine Winter and Neil Bourgeois say they plan to put one on their house.
“This is a last resort for the owners,” said Bourgeois.
The couple moved into their house in the sought -after neighborhood of the West End a year and a half. They chose the high -end and high -end district as a quiet location to raise their children.
“The playgrounds, the community, being able to walk to school have been very important to us,” said Winter.
But they say that the potential development next to it could change the neighborhood in the process of feeling in which they bought.
The website of the city of Edmonton shows the two lots directly north of winter and the house of Bourgeois has development permits during admission examination.
The two applications are intended for the construction of a four -speed row house, with two secondary suites and an unimpined front porch.
“We are just not sure that this meets the needs of the growth of the city and that certainly does not meet the needs of the community,” said Bourgeois.
A community group even tries to put restrictive clauses in all their historic district of the Center-West.
The Glenora district, which has a century and one of the most sought -after districts of Edmonton, was created in the 1910s with a restrictive alliance in place In some sections Called the warning of the Carruthers.
Get national news
For news that has an impact on Canada and worldwide, register for the safeguarding of news alerts that are delivered to you directly when they occur.
He was appointed according to the businessman who sold the land in the city with the warning that only the unified houses and the large extended land are authorized, to maintain his vision of Glenora as a prestigious residential area.
The alliance has been recorded on certain properties in Glenora, mainly on the south side (See card below.))
NOW, In a letter published on his Facebook page, The Glenora Community League requests the “support of owner colleagues to voluntarily accept to place a restrictive alliance on the title of their property which would prohibit the construction of these large multifamilial dwellings (sic.)” On their land.
A Calgary community is Take similar measures.
Real estate lawyer Shane Parker says it becomes more and more common.
“The city has a regulation and a zoning of land use where the city seeks to have comments and control over growth and development,” said Parker.
“A restrictive alliance is on the private side, which seeks to do the same thing.”
Parker says that it will be difficult for existing communities like Glenora to obtain sufficient coverage to completely eliminate multi-united houses.
“You can have 1,000 titles without the restrictive alliance. To link these titles, you would need 1,000 people to agree,” said Parker.
“It can be a challenge. There will be a variety of opinions. ”
Andrew Knack is the region’s advisor. He thinks that the conversation around restrictive clauses represents a point of tension for the development of the city.
“Everyone says, do not widen the border of our city, but when it comes to what the change looks like on my block, there will be a variety of opinions,” Knack said.
He hopes that the potential revisions of the zoning regulations will alleviate concerns.
“We must try to find this good counter which allows us to meet these objectives on the city level,” said Knack.
A public hearing on a zoning settlement is scheduled for June 30.
– With Karen Bartko files, Global News
& Copy 2025 Global News, A Division of Corus Entertainment Inc.