Ralph Waldo Emerson one day wrote: “Fiction reveals the truth that reality obscures”. There is a unique power to a story that is close to reality; A scenario “just tomorrow” which can encourage us to ask us how much of this story could take place in our lifetime, and more importantly, why.
The article continues after advertising
When an author relies on a real science – rather than “in a galaxy far, far – where the known world begins and the beginning imagined? I have always found this niche particularly delicious, first as a reader, and now as an author. My first novel, Symbiotetry to film this delicate balance. By weaving scientific plausibility in an exciting story, I wanted to deliver an edifying story that would resonate with … call it “disturbing clarity”.
Unlike future distant space operas or post-apocalyptic sagas, Symbiote A world lives only a few steps withdrawn from ours. It is Antarctica in 2028 and the middle of a regional war between the two superpowers of the world: the United States and China. In my mind, this proximity serves two vital objectives. First, it brings readers to face with a strangely accessible reality: the seeds of such a crisis have perhaps already sown in the world today. Second, the landing of the story in a somewhat strange but familiar context can amplify the horror of the situation. Not everyone has experienced Antarctica, but thanks to Covid-19, most people understand the psychological toll that isolation can have. The closer the crisis, the greater its impact.
Scientific progress, environmental stressors and geopolitical tensions can be inextricably linked. This route was widespread by Masters of Crime and Science Fiction. In JurassicMichael Crichton used advanced genetic science to resuscitate dinosaurs, transforming the search for bio-engineering into a heartbreaking lesson on the unpredictability of nature. Robin Cook’s medical thrillers, as Coma And EpidemicImmerse yourself in the darkest sides of biomedical innovation; These are stories about how technology intended for healing can cause unforeseen horrors. As a scientist and futuristic in my daily life, the fusion of credible scientific research on suspense and ethical complexity is something that I enjoy.
The narrative approach to the landing of extraordinary events in everyday science and the creation of a recognizable reality tape, allowed me to slip more easily into the shoes of the protagonist. I can immediately imagine myself in their situation, instead of suspending disbelief and going around. Andy Weir’s The Martian is an excellent example. The protagonist uses real scientific principles and problem solving strategies to overcome potentially fatal challenges. The meticulous attention of Weir’s details on the minitisms of survival on Mars captured our imagination.
The Martian also illustrates another principle that I tried to embody Symbiote: the power of a real place. Whether it is Mars or Antarctica, in places anchored in reality, the issues feel higher. This challenges readers to differentiate what is possible and what is purely speculative. The Antarctic framework of Symbiote serves as a microcosm for larger global problems, but a realistic level of detail and a sense of the place can amplify the reader’s experience, which even makes a speculative story more entertaining and stimulating. Carl Sagan Contact Explore communication with extraterrestrial intelligence, but a rigorous representation of science behind the search for extraterrestrial life provides an anchor of realism. When the imaginable and the fantastic are carefully woven together, he inspires both wonder and causes thoughtful skepticism.
The works of Neal Stephenson, as SevenevesTake this principle further. Although its stories often extend over centuries, they extrapolate the current scientific understanding of speculative future. Attention to realistic details – whether in orbital mechanics, genetic engineering or climatology – fails scientific authenticity. And this creates accounts that are both stimulating and suspected. These stories remind us that the seeds of our future are sown in today’s laboratories and conference rooms.
It is difficult to cope with fiction without giving conferences. It is even more difficult to preserve both fascinating and reflection. Rather than resorting to vague or mystical explanations, authors like Weir, Cook, Sagan and Crichton use specific scientific language to transform an abstract threat into a concrete and terrifying possibility. The ability to marry hard science with the narrative emergency is a characteristic of “quasi-future” science fiction, and is the one that I have always found wonderfully intriguing.
Realistic science fiction often works on a tightrope between scientific advancement and ethical responsibility. In SymbioteI tried to explore not only the terrifying possibilities of biological manipulation, but also on the moral dilemmas that occur when science is armed. There are deep implicit questions about the limits of human ambition and the dangers of the game God. This ethical tension is a central theme in the works of Crichton and Cook, which frequently wondered if scientific progress, in its implacable pursuit of knowledge, could inadvertently forces out of our will.
In the heart of Symbiote resides a question that has long intrigued readers of realistic science fiction: To what extent is science fiction and how much is science? How close is we close to a future where the lines between the two are indistinguishable? In the book, The Parasite, a “extremophilic” version of natural organisms blurs the border between speculative biology and empirical sciences. It is a plausible extension of current trends in environmental degradation, military conflicts and scientific ambition, rooted Biological research of Antarctica.
The insight of Emerson – that fiction can reveal truths that the reality obscured – provides for a new resonance in works of fiction “quasi -filure”. These stories not only entertain but also serve as childcare tales. They urge us to sail in the innovation border with curiosity and responsibility. They recall that our future, as illustrated in these stories, is shaped by the choices we make today. Science can be more than a simple backdrop of the drama. Indeed, science can be the engine that drives the story, readers difficult to consider the ethical and practical implications of our implacable pursuit of knowledge.
***
