
Growing up, Sara Blick-Nitko says that she “did not see any models” that were deaf working in science. Now, she tells students – here, on stage with an American sign -language interpreter – how a series of federal subsidies, known as the “dull scientist pipeline”, helped her obtain his doctorate. And work in a laboratory looking for cancer treatments.
ROCHESTER Institute of Technology
hide
tilting legend
ROCHESTER Institute of Technology
In the laboratory, Sara Blick-Nitko is looking for cancer treatments. But before she could become a scientist, she had to find what the deaf as she calls her the “scientific pipeline of the deaf”.
The federal subsidies that compensate for this pipeline helped her obtain a doctorate, to start her post-doctoral research and to overcome the multiple barriers that Historically, prevent deaf students from becoming scientists.
“Growing up, I have never met another deaf person working in the fields of science,” explains Blick-Nitko. “I haven’t seen any models.”
Now, however, the path that worked for Blick-Nitko has ended.
In recent weeks, the Trump administration has canceled a series of education subsidies which offered opportunities to deaf and hard of hearing students. These include scientific subsidies that have constituted the pipeline of deaf scientists. Those who have paid things like scholarships, mentoring programs, interpretation of sign language, benefits for research supplies and travel to professional conferences.
Another program, canceled by the Trump administration, paid graduate scholarships to fill the shortage of deaf teachers.
These are small programs, a few million dollars a year for everyone. University officials and students say that federal agencies have given vague explanations to end the programs, saying that they were no longer aligned with administration priorities.
With the cancellation of these competitive subsidies, the professional advancement of Blick-Nitko has become a little cloudy. He had a year left on the federal subsidy which financed its post-doctoral scholarship to study how cancer cells react to pharmacological drugs. Her laboratory director, she said, told him that he would try to find other funds to cover her next year at the University of Rochester Medical Center.

Blick-Nitko had a year to do the post-doctoral scholarship, paid by a federal subsidy. Throughout the country, deaf scientists face the sudden cancellation of their research subsidies by the Trump administration.
ROCHESTER Institute of Technology
hide
tilting legend
ROCHESTER Institute of Technology
Things are more uncertain for Matthew Peeks, 24, who just begins his career. Peeks estimated that he had found his vocation when, at the end of last year, he went to work in a school for deaf students in New York. He is an educational assistant in class at the Lexington school for the deaf, helping high school students and teachers.
“Everyone is very passionate about their work,” he said. “And everyone really cares about these students and wants the best for them.”
Peeks, the son hearing from two deaf parents, fluently grew up the American sign language. Now he wants to obtain a master’s degree and go up to become a teacher.
But the federal subsidy program for which he applied – to train deaf students teachers – has just been canceled. It was at the Columbia University Columbia University.
Peeks cannot afford tuition fees without this scholarship.
“I really have the impression that if things had been different, I would not feel, so lost and uncertain of my future,” he said.
The program to train deaf and difficulty in having been set up to address a nationwide shortage. The Teachers College program planned to train 24 teachers over the next three years, said co-director Elaine Smolen.
“It doesn’t seem to be a large number,” said Smolen. “But the impact of 24 teachers working with more than 30 students per year is huge.” She says that the school cannot train these teachers without this funding and that he has appealed to the United States Ministry of Education.
The Federal Agency did not respond to an NPR request to explain why the teacher training program was completed.
The National Institutes of Health, which financed the subsidies of the deaf scientists, said in a statement that it “took measures to end the funding of research which is not aligned” on the priorities of the administration “to directly affect the health of the Americans”.
Gerard Buckley says the loss of subsidies will Allow the health of Americans.
Buckley helped build the pipeline. He is president of the National Technical Institute for the Deaf, a scientific college for deaf and hard students of the increase in the Rochester Institute of Technology. Rochester, with sign language performers and NTID’s support, is a center for deaf scientists.
This spring, he had to tell his students that federal support for aspiring scientists has disappeared.
“They are naturally upset,” says Buckley. “They tried to train for these careers. They really thought they were doing the right thing. They were ready to contribute to the sciences and the treatment of diseases.”
His students, who, according to him, are impatient to contribute to the progress of knowledge in the sciences, “is just deaf”.
“But they are interested in cancer,” he said. “They are interested in the prevention of HIV, they are interested in pregnancy.”
Michelle Koplitz says that the sudden dismissal of her grant “completely launched my future plans in question”. She made a change in mid-career, abandoning her employment as a federal government in public health to continue a doctorate. At the school of medicine and dentistry of the University of Rochester.
It remains a year to finish.
Koplitz is studying how long -term health of deaf children is assigned when they are not taught in the American sign language or to live and go to school with others who do not use it.
She works with a deaf professor, Wyatte Hall, whose own career has been stimulated by the pipeline of deaf scientists. This financing of his postdoctoral research, Hall, said: “certainly opened the door to my subsequent success now as a member of the faculty” and the “very first Faculty of Track of Deaf Losses” at the University of Rochester Medical Center. (Deaf people use “deaf” to refer to the medical condition of hearing loss and “deaf” to note a cultural and social identity.)

Michelle Koplitz spoke to students of La Rochester School for the Deaf in 2018 the way in which the careers in science, formerly rare for the deaf, had now opened with the help of government research subsidies. She used them to get her doctorate. But now the program is over. “I am back at square one,” she fears.
Rochester school for the deaf
hide
tilting legend
Rochester school for the deaf
The canceled programs, which include U-Rise, bridges on the doctoral training program and the student development maximization initiative, were created to help anyone from a “under-represented” group, including black and Latin students, not just deaf students.
Earlier this month, the American Public Health Association and other complainants continued the National Institutes of Health And then asked for a preliminary injunction To restore research and height and education research subsidies. “The sudden dismissal of funding places participating in students at an immediate risk of losing housing, income and academic continuity,” said the association in its trial. The NIH did not respond to the pursuit.
Nikki Maphis, a complainant in this trial, was waiting to hear a decision on her request for a highly competitive search for research when she learned that the program had been canceled. Maphis, at the health sciences center at the New Mexico University, qualified as the first in his family to frequent the university.
Now she does not know if she will have the possibility of continuing to do her research on the link between Alzheimer’s disease and alcoholism, because the government has closed the program that she hoped to let her continue. “They essentially transmit a message that says:” You are not good enough to be here. We don’t want you here, “she said.
Koplitz says that the work supported by the pipeline helps to counter the biases and the obstacles facing deaf people when they try to access the health care system. A common problem: not being able to communicate with a hearing doctor or another healthcare professional.
Earlier this year, Koplitz spoke with the deaf under the deaf students at the Rochester Institute of Technology, where she went to university. Several, in a program that is now canceled, has spoken of plans to go to the Faculty of Medicine. More than a dozen years ago before the start of the deaf scientists’ pipeline, Koplitz had abandoned his dreams of medicine.
So when she spoke to the excited students, she wondered: “If I had obtained this support … If my future would have been very different.”
Now she says she is worried about her own future in science and for theirs.