You can lock your door with your phone, turn on the air conditioning with a finger stroke and even adjust the temperature of your refrigerator from a condition far. All these forms of intelligent technology are part of a new encroached technological wave which, in many ways, seems quite harmless. The reality, however, depicts a different image in the context of domestic violence. Women have reported Partners using intelligent technology to terrorize them and try to control their lives, for example by modifying the password on the front door or ring the bell to create a feeling of paranoia on several occasions. Intelligent technology is unique in its ability to penetrate many facets of life and to strip individuals of control over simple but important things such as lights, thermostats and locks. Given its potential role in domestic violence, governments must ensure that intelligent technological companies are held responsible for ensuring that their products pretending to be against this use.
While cases of the involvement of intelligent technology in abuses have been revealed in recent years, the United Kingdom has so far seems more aware of the problem than most other countries, as a large number of items writing On this question comes from British information sources. The problem is probably globally, and deserves international recognition while intelligent technology is becoming more and more common, the number of houses with intelligent technology worldwide to reach more than 480 million year. This problem is still complicated by the fact that most women, a group vulnerable to domestic violence, do not even know that intelligent technology can be used for mistreatment, with 48% of women unable to name which smart devices could be used for this purpose. Despite this ignorance, for women who suffer abuses, 72% have experienced how technology can amplify its effects.
Although the abuses of partners using intelligent technology have attracted increased attention, the use of intelligent technology in children’s abuse remains specifically in the shadows. Child mistreatment should not however be neglected, because 27% All cases of abuse involve children’s abuse as facility by technology, including intelligent technology. Among these cases, the most common type of abuse is hunt and surveillance, which intelligent technology is well positioned to achieve. Indeed, in cases such as Mitchell c. Ramlow At the Supreme Court of Idaho, a protective order was made against Ramlow in part to the accusation he would have given to his son and Mitchell a smartwatch with follow -up capacities in order to harass.
Attracting more attention to this question in the context of children’s abuse is essential, as children can be the population most vulnerable to the abusive use of intelligent technology, because their autonomy is considerably limited, and they spend more time in the House. In addition, children are disadvantaged due to limited knowledge of the operation of technology and household appliances. Generally, only 30-40% Children under 12 can even use smart devices, such as voice assistants, and even less to understand how to change their parameters. With these considerations, the call for the prevention of the use of intelligent technology in domestic violence should specify children’s abuse as a main development point for the design of responsible technology.
Although these problems are part of a new border, the international community of digital rights and human rights has already started to tackle the impact of intelligent technology on the rights to children’s confidentiality, offering a potential starting point to approach intelligent technology in child abuse. Organizations such as Human Rights Watch Began to emphasize how intelligent children’s toys, fed by AI, collect data on children that can be used in advertising or even to discriminate certain children on the basis of sensitive evidence collected without the knowledge of children or parents. In response to such concerns, the Science for the political report by the joint research center of the European Commission has sought to develop guidelines for the ethical implementation of AI and intelligent technology in the sphere of children’s life by using information collected from the main stakeholders, especially the children themselves. These requirements include transparency, responsibility and children’s rights to the agency. If intelligent technology is held to these standards, it will help reduce the abuses of these technologies, which suggests that the framework for resolving intelligent technology abuses is already under construction by fighting the operations by children’s data by children.
Certain organizations, such as the Boston Children’s Wellness Labhave also started to pay more attention to the implications of lack of confidentiality that intelligent technology facilitates with regard to children’s dynamics. In particular, with regard to parental control software, the organization notes that one of the problems with this software is its all or nothing approach, in which parents receive regulatory control with little or no space for children’s self -regulation, and parents often only have the choice between blocking all content or nothing. At these moments, solving the confidentiality problems of intelligent technology and solving the potential abusive implications of computer science, which indicates that the solving one problem can help the other.
Tackling this overall harmful potential for intelligent technology and digital space, in general, drew the attention of the UN, because it expressed General comment n ° 25which provides advice to states in terms of application United Nations Convention on Children’s Rights to children’s interactions with technology. In its commentary, the UN stresses that states must impose regulations to protect children from violence facilitated by technology, and it calls on companies to be responsible for the design of technology in a way that does not violate children’s rights. It also indicates that companies should adopt a proactive approach to monitor their products and their impact on the rights of children potentially. The UN has also noted that countries are responsible for ensuring that companies act in a way of conforming to these stipulations. These guidelines fall under the global principles set out by the United Nations Convention on Children’s Rights, Including acting in the best interest of the child and preserving his right to life, survival and development.
Despite the recognition of the UN for the need for government and corporate action to solve the problems that can affect children, as facilitated by technology, the responsibility of protecting oneself against the abuse of intelligent technology rests entirely on individuals Rather than intelligent technological companies. The inaction of these companies is helped by general ignorance as well as the lack of legal requirements in most countries to set up guarantees. In this context, many organizations Call on a greater consciousness surrounding the way intelligent technology has been used in children and partners’ abuse. Although technological companies cannot guarantee that their technology will never be used for abuse, IBM Presentation that these companies can alleviate the risk of abuse by implementing specific security measures for smart devices.
IBM recommendations include the call of technological companies to consciously design the operations of their intelligent products with the intention of preventing abuses, for example by allowing users to choose the data shared with other users. IBM also recommends that intelligent technological devices be designed to maintain an exact recording of users who have carried out the actions to protect themselves against the risk of intelligent technology to manipulate individuals and help the distortion of memory. Other recommendations include the elimination of the structure of the intelligent system in which a person has a main control over the operation of technology and the increase in the ease of use of intelligent technologies, thus limiting the risk that certain parts do not understand how to use technology. This final recommendation will probably be vital in the case of children’s abuse, as children can find it difficult to understand how home technology is used against them and how they can act to stop its use.
These conscious conceptions can greatly contribute to limiting the role of Smart Tech in domestic violence, but these design initiatives must include conscious reflection on the potential of products for children’s abuse, in addition to the mistreatment of partners. Organizations, such as Canadian Standard Association Grouphave already started to defend the need for a child -centered approach to guarantee that intelligent technology cannot facilitate the violation of children’s privacy rights, and this framework can be extended to call for a child -centered approach during the analysis of all potential deficits of intelligent technology, including abuse.
It is unlikely that technological companies will take these measures without the appropriate incentives; Consequently, public awareness is necessary to mobilize politicians to implement regulations on this industry. These regulations could align with IBM’s recommendations, as in the form of legislation requiring an independent examination of intelligent products before their release. Such a review could involve the notation of the potential risk of abuse technology and suggest ways to mitigate this danger before the product arrives on the market. THE policy And technological The communities have already gathered to agree that children must be protected online against cyberbullying and sexual exploitation, and now the community must come together again to ensure that children are protected in their own technology house that brings the Internet in their daily interactions.