Ministers plan to offer key concessions to Their plans to facilitate the task of artificial intelligence companies to use work protected by copyrightIn a partial rise after weeks of lobbying of some of the most famous artists in the world.
Sources have told the Guardian that the ministers had accepted the need to protect the British creative industries from the plans, which would otherwise have made their work available to access by AI companies unless they have deliberately withdrew.
THE Proposals have been defended Through the technology industry, but has also caused a conspicuous of some of the main lights in the creative industry, including Elton John, Damon Albarn and director Beeban Kidron. People who are aware of the discussions say that managers discuss a range of modifications made to the plans, which would exempt certain sectors from the opt-out system and give preferential access to British AI companies.
One of them said: “The ministers would like to find something very much with which everyone can work. To completely abandoning plans is not considered an option because it would put British AI companies in a disadvantage, but there are ways to protect certain sectors that are particularly important and to ensure that the great giants of American technology do not benefit from it. »»
A government spokesperson said: “No decision will be made as long as we are absolutely convinced that we have a practical plan that provides each of our objectives, including increased control for rights holders to help them easily agree with their content, allowing lawful access to materials to train IA models in the world head in the United Kingdom, and the construction of greater transparency on the materials used.”
The plan aimed at granting an exemption from the rules of British copyright for AI companies that seek to train their models were announced earlier this year as part of a crossed push to stimulate the British AI industry.
AI models feed systems such as Chatppt use large amounts of data from the Internet and learn to locate models. This allows them to produce understandable text, plausible images and a convincing audio.
However, he provoked an angry response from British artists, with Paul McCartney saying AI “Could simply take over”. Elton John, one of the most eminent supporters of plowing in the last elections, said this weekend The plans “would destroy the leadership of the United Kingdom” in the music industry.
Over 1,000 musicians, including Kate Bush, Damon Albarn and Annie Lennox, Release a silent album Tuesday to protest the plans.
Faced with a concerted reaction of some of the most famous celebrities in the country, those responsible are looking for means to offer them additional protections. One might be to allow creative industries to oppose the new system, while offering mass companies free of charge such as journalism unless these companies are withdrawn.
Another would be to allow the British AI companies to benefit from a withdrawal system, while forcing their American counterparts to guarantee their consent before accessing material protected by copyright.
Ministers say they want to protect British creative producers in their final plans, which will be announced later this year.
Addressing journalists during a commercial mission in Delhi, the business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, said that the creators could “be able to earn a decent life … (that is) absolutely something that we have to integrate for the future”.
He added that ministers were to obtain balance on copyright and listened to the concerns of the creative industries.
“We absolutely believe that creative industries are essential in the United Kingdom in economic and cultural terms and we want to rely on this force,” he said.
Others, however, are skeptical about concessions that the government could offer without completely abandoning its plans.
An initiate of the music industry consulted on the proposals: “The officials have repeatedly promised to offer” railings “to protect the creative industries, but they did not say exactly how they would work.
“The idea of tearing the law on copyright for certain sectors but not for others is frankly nonsense.”