The Alaska legislature approved what would be the first measure of the State to increase the new important revenues in a decade and, in doing so, has released a key section of its own education bill.
On Wednesday, the Alaska Chamber voted 26 to 14 to update corporate income tax for companies that do business on the Internet. The measurement of income is linked to pay part of Bill 57, a measure of financing for bipartite education on hold Verdict of Governor Dunleavy.
“This is excellent news,” said senator Bill Wiechowski, D-Anchorage, sponsor of legislation on Wednesday after the vote. “This is a critical bill. It can generate essential income for financing education, and this will not be translated into new taxes on Alaska. ”
Senate bill 113 It would be specified that companies that make at least 50% of sales of online goods or services, in Alaska or delivered to Alaska customers, have to pay a state tax. Currently, companies can affirm that a sale takes place outside the state in a farm or a warehouse of corporate servers, and not subject to the taxation of Alaska. But companies are always subject to taxes in the states where they are located, so that supporters of the bill argue that the update of “market -based supply” will report these tax revenue in Alaska.
Wiechowski argued that it was a matter of equity for Alaskians. “When a sale is made on the Internet, it often uses our high speed funded by the State. When a product is shipped, it enters our airports funded by the State or our port of Alaska. It is transported by truck on our roads funded by the State, and through our bridges funded by the State,” he told the Chamber’s financing committee of the Chamber of the Chamber and the Chamber from the room and in the room of the room of the room. Friday.
“And who pays for all this? The inhabitants of Alaska,” he said. “While the Out of State Corporation pays very little, or probably nothing in the case of very digitized companies, … This bill corrects this inequality.”
The bill has also aroused the support of certain more conservative republican legislators, including Senator Rob Yundt, R-Wasilla, who wrote an indelicative Posted in The Anchorage Daily News. “Today, very digitized companies can rattle in hundreds of millions of dollars in Alaskians without ever setting foot in our state. They compete directly with our local retailers, moving the prices and moving local jobs, “he wrote.
“Because the double taxation is illegal, if Alaska exercises its legitimate authority for companies like Amazon on the income they earn here, they will no longer be imposed on this income.
Corinne Smith
/ /
Alaska tag
Under the federal tax law, companies are imposed according to the distribution or a formula according to the income of the goods, payroll and sales of a company. Under the legislation, only sales in Alaska would be taken into account for companies deemed “very digitized”, which means that more than 50% of their business is carried out online.
The legislation does not modify the tax rates or supports of Alaska companies.
Other Republicans, such as representative Jamie Allard, R-Eagle River, opposed the tax, which raises concerns of companies would modify the cost of tax and increase consumers’ prices. “I think it will have an impact on people,” she said at the meeting of the Chamber’s finance committee on Friday. “I feel like it’s a hidden cost for the Alaska.”
Wiechowski said prices are generally set at national level and at least indicated 36 States which already have a certain form of this income tax of companies based on locally. “So, insofar as we think that our implementation will prevail over the impacts of California doing it and New York doing it-and Caroline du Nord doing it, and Ohio doing it, and Oregon doing it, and all these other states-I know that we love ourselves,” he said, to laugh at the Commission, “but I don’t think we have a commercial impact”. “”
By updating the law to capture these business sales, the bill could generate 25 to 65 million dollars each year to the complete implementation, according to an estimate of the State. It would cost more than $ 250,000 to administer, said the state income department.
Legislators have linked income to pay part of House Bill 57an education funding bill for next year, which is While waiting for a decision from Dunleavy.
The legislators adopted the bill at the end of April, with around $ 22 million assigned to reading subsidies and $ 10 million for vocational and technical education programs – the two political elements sought by Dunleavy. But the legislators returned this contingent to the Senate bill 113 too.
The lecturer of the Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham Chamber, said that the legislation would generate essential income for the state.
“I do not think it is lost for many members of the Legislative Assembly that we are now entering at a time when we will have to examine other income measures. And you can interpret this as a first step in this direction, “he said,” that the governor approves or not.
The last time the Legislative Assembly approved a significant income measure, it was in 2015, when the legislators voted to add a surcharge of 0.95 cents per gallon to the tax on state fuels in order to finance the response and the prevention of spills.
The bill on the financing of education is now with Dunleavy, which has until May 17 to sign it, veto or let it become law without its signature. If he vetoed him, the heads of the majority say that they believe that they have the votes to prevail.
In the days preceding the House vote on SB 113, the legislators complain Dunleavy staff in the income department refused to answer questions about legislation.
“When you have a whole department that simply says that we are not going to help you with legislation, I have never experienced this for my stay here,” Wiechowski said on Tuesday before the vote.
The SB 113 now returns to the Senate House, then will be sent to the Governor’s office.
How the legislators voted:
In favor
Robyn Niayuq Burke, D-UTQIAGIK
Jeremy bynum, R-atchikan
Ashley Carrick, D-Fairbanks
Mia Costello, R-Anchorage
Maxine Dibert, D-Fairbanks
Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham
Ted eischeid, d-anchorage
Zack Fields, D-Anchorage
Neal Foster, D-Nome
Alyse Galvin, I-Anchorage
Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage
Carolyn Hall, D-Anchorage
Sara Hannan, D-Juneau
Rebecca Himschoot, I-Sitka
Ky Holland, i-anchorage
Nellie Unangiq Jimmie, D-Bethel
Andy Josephson, D-Anchorage
Chuck Kopp, R-Anchorage
Donna Mears, D-Anchorage
EXEXIE MOORE, R-WASILLA
Geneviève Mina, D-Anchorage
Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna
Calvin Schrage, I-Anchorage
Will Stapp, R-Fairbanks
Andi Story, D-Juneau
Louise States, R-Kodiak
Against
Jamie Allard, R-Eagle River
Julie Coulombe, R-Anchorage
Bill Elam, R-Nikiski
Delena Johnson, R-Palmer
Kevin McCabe, R-BIG LAKE
David Nelson, R-Anchorage
Mike Prax, R-North Pole
George Rauscher, R-Sutton
Dan Saddler, R-Eagle River
Rebecca Schwanke, R-Glennalen
Cathy Tilton, R-Wasilla
Frank Tomaszewski, R-Fairbanks
Jubilee Underwood, R-Wasilla
Sarah Vance, R-Homer