The United States has announced a new policy to refuse visas to foreign managers who remove publications on the social networks of American citizens, by degenerating tensions on freedom of expression and digital censorship. This president’s decision Donald TrumpThe administration has a direct impact on American technological companies such as Twitter, Meta and Rumble, which had to face increasing pressure from foreign governments to moderate content on their platforms. Policy highlights a broader confrontation between American technology giants and international regulators on content moderation, data sovereignty and the global scope of American platforms.
What the new visa policy of the United States says
Secretary of state Marco Rubio, who has aroused controversy by revoking visas for militants criticizing Israel and intensifying social media projections for foreign students, has developed policy in response to “blatant censorship actions” by foreign officials against American technological companies. Rubio’s Declaration stressed that it is “unacceptable” for foreign officials to demand that American platforms adopt moderation policies of world content or censor content in a way that extends beyond their competence in the United States. Although Rubio did not appoint specific objectives, he recently referred to sanctions against the Moraes judge of Brazil, who faced X on disinformation policies. The actions of Moraes, including the temporary prohibition X and the suspension of Rumble, have been cited as examples of overtaking that threaten the operations of American technological companies.Politics also responds to wider tensions with American allies like Germany and the United Kingdom, which have implemented strict laws against online hate speech and disinformation. Germany, for example, applies the NetzDG law, forcing platforms to delete illegal content within 24 hours or to face heavy fines. The Trump administration, including vice-president JD Vance, criticized these measures as a suffocating freedom of expression, in particular for conservative voices. Vance, in a February 2025 speech in Munich, accused Germany of “shining” far -right groups despite their growing popularity, a position reproduced by the head of the State Department Samuel Samson. In a test of May 27, 2025, Samson argued that European regulations on social networks reflect a “censorship strategy” which undermines democracy, linking the parallels to the perceived interior censorship of Trump and his supporters.
How the new visa policy of the United States is aimed at technological companies
American technological companies operate in a complex global landscape where their platforms – used by billions in the world – are subject to different national speech laws, disinformation and content of hatred. Countries like Brazil, Germany and the United Kingdom have imposed more stringent regulations on online content, often confusing themselves with the more permissive approach of the United States under the first amendment. These regulations have led to high-level disputes, such as the Brazil’s temporary temporary ban on Twitter in 2024, ordered by the Supreme Court Judge Alexandre de Moraes, until the platform responds to requests to remove the accounts accused of propagation of disinformation. Likewise, Rumble, a popular video sharing platform with the conservative public, has faced a suspension in Brazil to refuse to block the account of a user based in the United States. These actions have raised concerns between American technological companies concerning their ability to operate worldwide without compromising their commitment to freedom of expression or legal repercussions.The American technology industry, valued at more than 10 billions of dollars and employing millions, depends strongly on global markets for income and user growth. Companies like Twitter, led by Elon Musk, and Meta, which operates Facebook And InstagramThe accusations have been faced several times to allow disinformation or hate speech abroad, which has prompted foreign governments to demand content moves or account suspensions. Such requests often conflict with American laws, such as article 230 of ACT communications, which protects liability platforms for the content generated by users. The new American visa policy aims to protect these companies by putting pressure on foreign authorities to refrain from actions that could be considered unsuccessful for American sovereignty or rights to the freedom of expression of American citizens.
How the new visa law in the United States is good and bad news for American technological companies
For American technological companies, visa policy is a double -edged sword. On the one hand, he reports robust support for the Trump administration, potentially dissuade foreign officials from targeting American platforms with aggressive regulations. This is particularly important for companies like Twitter, which has been faced with legal battles in Brazil, and Rumble, which occurs as an alternative in freedom in traditional platforms. Policy could strengthen their negotiation power in foreign markets, where they face pressure to comply with local laws or risk prohibitions and fines.On the other hand, the policy risks an increase in diplomatic tensions, which could lead to reprisal measures against American technological companies. Brazil, for example, is a major market for platforms like Meta and X, with more than 100 million social media users. An escalation of the Tit-For-Tat could lead to new restrictions or prohibitions, which has an impact on income and user engagement. In addition, the emphasis placed by the policy on the protection of “American sovereignty” can complicate the operations of American companies that rely on global interoperability and must navigate in various regulatory executives.