Recent bosh shows increasing concerns about the reliability and efficiency of the public health system. The survey, led by Th Cha Cha Chan School of Public Health of Harvard, aims to understand the opinions of American adults on the landscape of public health and the federal agenda during the first 100 days of the Trump administration.
First 100 days of presidency a symbolic reference
Since the deep regulatory and legislative reforms thrilled in the first 100 days of President Roosevelt in 1933 Political experts and observers used the first 100 days of a new administration as an opportunity to reflect on the objectives and efficiency of the new government. While the first 100 days have no legal importance – and for many administrations, the highest titles of the early days are completely retreating by meaning by the end of the term – it is nevertheless a largely accepted reference which reflects the possibilities of an administration to clearly articulate and implement its program, or not do it.
Respondents expect confidence in health agencies to decrease
The survey of the Chan School of Public Health questioned adults on their feelings and their confidence in public health agencies and their recommendations at the start of the administration and more recently. They found that the majority of the two parties had positive feelings on health agencies and the recommendations of confidence of agencies. However, they found that changes in public health leadership prompted more people to “predict the loss of confidence in the recommendations of public health agencies than to obtain it. “The changes of confidence have been divided according to the parties, with most of the Democrats, saying that they will lose confidence and a (smaller) majority of the Republicans saying that they will gain confidence in the recommendations.
The Medicare Rights assistance service hears similar concerns
The survey did not separate respondents according to age or types of insurance coverage, but calls for our national assistance line reflect similar concerns. In the responses to the survey, the people who were pessimistic about the work of the CDC in the future have cited fears that the CDC makes health recommendations which are influenced by the policy, reduce the back or the reduction of “too” programs, minimize important health problems or reduce public access to important health information. Medicare Rights heard the same types of concerns on the part of people with Medicare, their families and the professionals who serve them.
People through the political spectrum need access to high-quality and affordable health care and specific scientific information to protect their basic needs, well-being and financial stability.
At Medicare Rights, we are committed to strengthening the efficiency and reliability of public health agencies. People through the political spectrum need access to high-quality and affordable health care and specific scientific information to protect their basic needs, well-being and financial stability.